Archive for the ‘Publishing deals’ Category

Should scriptwriters write novels as well?

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

This blog is an article from TwelvePoint.com (without the illustrations). After a spirited #scriptchat session on Twitter where many of the questions related to writing in different formats (check out #scriptchat) I was asked to make this article available to non TwelvePoint members so here it is.

Julian Friedmann is an agent representing both scriptwriters and book writers. In this article he looks at some of the reasons why scriptwriters should also consider writing prose, not instead of but in addition to scripts. He demystifies the publishing process for writers, explaining how to access alternative ways to earn money.

This article is based on a talk I gave at the Screenwriters’ Festival in Cheltenham in October 2009. When we did a survey of delegates early in 2009, writing novels was low down the list of priorities yet in October 2009, the lecture was so crowded that not everyone who wanted to could get in.

What happened between early 2009 and late 2009 to bring about that change? Several things could explain the change. Perhaps what else was on during the Festival at that time was not very interesting? The recession had begun to take its toll of the creative industries: film and television budgets had been cut and staff made redundant. In publishing the same was true, with advances falling for newer writers, editors being fired and lists cut, so that a publishing company that previously released 100 books a year might now be releasing 70. That meant that they already had 30 for the following year and, as a result, were looking to buy fewer books than before.

There is big business to be made out of writing and selling rights in books.

Why should scriptwriters think about writing novels if publishing is also having problems? The main reasons are not straightforward but there are sound arguments to recommend it. In the same way that the film industry is seen by some to be healthy despite the recession (bumper box-office receipts largely because movie going is not an expensive form of entertainment ‘per hour’), so publishing overall is not in bad shape because reading is another inexpensive way of spending leisure time.

Brand name authors do better in recessions – although the ‘mid-list’ suffers – and niche books on specialised subjects sell as well as before because they are not impulse buys.

I spent my customary week in Frankfurt earlier in October at the Frankfurt Book Fair (as I have for nearly 40 years) where many thousands of publishers from all over the world were selling rights in books to each other. In one building, the Film & Media Rights Centre, there were also producers trying to buy film and television rights to books. On some days I had so many meetings that they could only be 15 minute slots.

In other words, there is big business to be made out of writing and selling rights in books and, in the troubled financial time we find ourselves in, I believe that it is increasingly important for scriptwriters to think outside the box. One way to do this is to step back and reconsider what it is you do.
Scriptwriters tell stories in a particular format, in Courier 12 point font, usually in three acts. The significant word here is ‘stories’. Most scriptwriters become scriptwriters because they are passionate about movies and television drama or the theatre, and most scriptwriters spend a great deal of time trying to get to grips with the complex and often inscrutable legal and contractual aspects of doing business as a scriptwriter.

They also face endless disputes between the so-called experts as to whether there are 3 acts, 22 steps, 12 stages and so on. They are caught up in disputes between script editors, producers and directors, and are sometimes fired to be replaced with a writer who has less talent. There are literally hundreds of books about writing scripts and hundreds of courses, long and short, degree courses and two-hour miracle fixes.

What is so often missing from courses is really useful information about the psychological makeup of the characters; instead the courses tend to focus on – amongst other things – writing script formatted documents. What writers write about is human behaviour but this is rarely a component of scriptwriting courses.

I have also realised from many conversations over decades with scriptwriters that the vast majority are daunted by the idea of attempting to write a novel. There seem to be two main reasons for this. The first is that a novel is rather long. It has been estimated that the average novel is 100,000 words whereas the average script is apparently 30,000 words.

Secondly, publishing is a completely different business with its own arcane rules, terms and contracts, all of which are daunting to have to deal with if you don’t have an agent who can pave the way for you.
I would like to suggest that writing prose is a serious and complementary activity for scriptwriters. There are many reasons for this but the main ones seem to me to be as follows

• Most of you have probably read more novels than you’ve read scripts and you would certainly have had some training at school and possibly university to write prose probably long before you had any training to write scripts.

• Compared to writing a script, writing prose is relatively straightforward and it does not require the same obsessional adherence to structural templates that scripts need to demonstrate for them to be taken seriously when submitted.

• I believe that one of the great fallacies in the teaching of scriptwriting is precisely that I do not believe we should be teaching ’scriptwriting’. Instead I believe writers should study (and learn to appreciate) storytelling. One of the most important motivations, apart from making money, for a writer should be that he or she is compelled to be a storyteller and after forty years of working with writers, I believe it’s easier to tell the story in prose than in script. As Alexander Mackendrick, the director of The Ladykillers said: ‘Don’t try to work out story in script form; do it in prose first.’

• A great advantage of writing a novel as opposed to a script is that you can describe what characters think and feel, something you can’t easily or acceptably do in a script. In other words, a draft of a novel can be a very extended treatment enabling you to work out the subtleties of character and plot for your proposed feature film. Admittedly it can take many months. As Robert McKee said when asked how long it should take to write a script, it should take about 6 months but you shouldn’t start writing the script for 5½ months.

• Whether you’re able to sell the novel or not, it might be easier to find a publisher for a well-worked-out manuscript taking us into the hearts and minds of the characters, the emotions, the pace and the plot – effectively a template for the film – than to find a producer willing to put up money for the script version. Furthermore, should a producer make you an offer to option your prose document, one of your deal points can be that you have to be given the first crack at the script. If a publisher therefore makes an offer for your novel, whatever you do, do not allow them to control film dramatisation rights; keep those yourself.

• My final argument for the value of investing time in writing a novel as opposed to working in a bar is that all things being equal, by which I mean if your prose writing ability is as good as your scriptwriting ability, novels and therefore novelists tend to make more money than scripts or scriptwriters. This may not be true in Hollywood where silly money can be paid for a script but it is true in Europe, particularly in Britain. You need to remember that in Britain we make about a 100 movies a year but we publish about 100,000 books a year.

Those are the main reasons why I think scriptwriters and storytellers should take prose seriously.

However, it does mean learning how to get to grips with the structure of the publishing industry, the very different way of trying to sell book rights and, when you get an offer, having to try and deal with contracts that are even more alien to you than the script contracts with which you’re more familiar.

What follows is a very rapid tour through the publishing industry so that you have some idea of how it differs from the film and television industries in order that you might be in a better position to think about whether to turn some of your story ideas into prose before or instead of into script.

There are many aspects of approaching writing a book that are similar to the approach for writing a script. You have to think about the market: is there a market for what you want to write? Let’s take horror for a moment. There are specialised publishing lists that publish horror, not many but easy to identify. How easy is it to identify producers who are interested in horror? Quite difficult because as soon as you discover one who is doing a horror film, you will also probably discover that they don’t really want another at the same time whereas a publisher who does say ten horror novels a year will not be put off by the fact that they have all ten if a really good one comes along.

How do you check the market? Read widely, check the best-seller lists, spend time browsing in bookstores, try to read the publishing trade papers (the main one being The Bookseller). You need to know what sells just like you should when writing scripts. If a particular type of novel (say Brigit Jones’ Diary or The Da Vinci Code) is a huge hit, don’t assume you should copy it because the timetable of the publishing industry is very slow. From acceptance by a publisher of a completed manuscript that they have bought until publication is usually more than a year. By the time you have written your opus it might be two years after The Da Vinci Code is in the best-seller list before your book is published.

On the other hand, as a genre this kind of conspiracy thriller is a stable genre and if your book has something that sets it apart and is very fast-paced with endless reversals, tension and suspense, then it will probably find a publisher at any time.

You could always self-publish and have printed copies in about a week. So why the delay with regular publishers? Simple: most publishers already have all the books they are going to publish in the next 12 months and some for the following year.

Your choice or genre, theme and subject should be based in part on what you know you can do best. Many scriptwriters try to set scripts in the USA because they believe that is a bigger market than their own but in reality few non-Americans write scripts with the muscular intensity that American writers seem to have and you will not be around the corner for a script editor to sit down with you to work on the rewrites.

For a novel it is easier but still problematical. There is not a big market for books set in the Middle East despite The Kite Runner so where you set a book, the nationality of the central characters and the genre can all play a part in making your novel more likely to sell.

If you are writing the book as a template for a film, remember that it costs no more to publish a novel with a cast of thousands than a cast of three, but don’t be lured into expansiveness and still expect it to be easy to sell film rights, although a great novel with a cast of thousands is far more likely to be picked up for film if the book performs really well than an original script is likely to be picked up.

With google and the internet it is possible to conjure up a location so well that people reading will believe that you have been there. I suggested to a novelist client many years ago that he set a spy story in Russia. He had never been there and didn’t know the genre. I provided him with research books (this was in the early 1980s, long before the internet) and after publication, one major American newspaper reviewed the book (which was made into the television mini series Codename Kyril) with the words ‘Mr Trenhaile, who obviously knows Moscow like the back of his hand…’ We had a good laugh at that.

In the next part of this article, Julian Friedmann goes on to look at what kinds of novels writers might choose, how to submit and to whom, how offers for rights are made to authors and how contracts are negotiated.

Julian Friedmann is an agent at Blake Friedmann, Editor of ScriptWriter Magazine (now published at TwelvePoint.com), Board Director of the International Screenwriting Festival (Cheltenham) and author of How to Make Money Screenwriting (Intellect, 2000).

Writing for money or for yourself?

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

I am doing the research for a book on writing for television and came across this quote (in a tweet): “Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.” Cyril Connolly

I re-tweeted, commenting that what Cyril Connolly is saying is rubbish. It is simply not true for 95% of the thousands of writers I have met over the last 40 years. It is cute but makes assumptions about the purity of being a writer that suggests pure self-indulgence.

There are some writers who genuinely do not care if no one ever reads what they write. There are mss and scripts in bottom drawers that stay there. There may even be some masterpieces in those drawers, since writers are often not the best judges of what they have written.

The book on writing for television, which I am co-writing with Christopher Walker with whom I set up the MA in Television Scriptwriting at De Montfort University (check it out http://bit.ly/4BTnVd), is intended to be the best guide to actually getting to work for TV producers and broadcasters.

Why set up a post-grad course focused only on television? Because that is the only place where writers can more easily get hired, earn money and (perhaps as important) get the experience of going through the development process so that they can see how what they imagined ends up on screen, as it passes through many hands, from casting directors to script editors, producers, directors, actors and film or tape editors.

This is the coal-face, this is where the real learning is done, rather than in academia where all too often the teaching is done by academics not very experienced practitioners. And in far too many universities the industry guest lecturers are to few and far between.

I have no problem with writers writing for their bottom drawer. But most are desperate to be read and watched; most have something important to say and most want to earn a living from their writing. Quotes like the Connolly one need to be balanced by the famous Samuel Johnson quote “No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money.”

Neither are 100% correct, but the Johnson quote is far closer to the reality than the Connolly one.

If you can’t join them, beat them.

Friday, December 18th, 2009

The Writers’ Guild blog has an interesting and important debate over the assertion that the BBC Writers’ Academy favours its trainees so that other writers get less of a chance. This blog is partly my response to the debate in the WGGB blog.

http://writersguild.blogspot.com/2009/12/bbc-writersroom-update.html

A couple of years ago I interviewed John Yorke, BBC TV series supremo:

http://www.twelvepoint.com/files/Interview%20John%20Yorke_Julian%20Friedmann.pdf

john-york1

It was clear then that the Academy made sense from the BBC’s point of view: they would get a better-trained cadre of writers, who would deliver more usable scripts in less time, thus saving time and money.

Other writers (such as my own clients) would probably get less access to slots even though some of them have had many years of diligent service in writing dozens and dozens of soap and series scripts.

There cannot be enough to go round for everyone. As a result of the increase in degree courses for scriptwriters over the last 5 years there are also now many more writers with some experience (even if it is spec academic scripts) trying for the decreasing number of slots. Inevitably there will be fewer writers getting a piece of the pie.

On top of that the BBC like the other broadcasters are having to cut the budgets of their shows. This is a reality they would be negligent not to deal with. Using equally talented writers who have been trained in the in-house hothouse of the Academy is pragmatic and sensible even though the Beeb admits a kind of sadness that they can’t please all the people all the time. But I don’t see anyone protesting at the ever-increasing new degree courses in scriptwriting that will turn out hungry and ambitious writers also after those slots.

The key – which I have encouraged through the pages of TwelvePoint.com and as an agent is to be flexible and adapt. There have been several long-running series and soaps cancelled in the last 4 or 5 years: between 500 and 600 episodes have disappeared; add that to the Academy writers and the new graduates and any scriptwriter who assumes that they can behave as they have in the past will end up probably out in the cold for a lot of the time.

Writers have to be more proactive; they have to start partially being like producers; they have to write saleable and commercial spec scripts; they have to consider other formats like novels – I had amazing feedback in Cheltenham on a session about novel writing for scriptwriters.

They way we were has gone. Like the ice shelf at the North Pole. As an agent I have had to make changes to the way I work to deal with the changing business in which we all work: so writers need to make changes. If you are a storyteller and want to earn a living by telling stories then tell stories for people who want to buy them in the format that they want to buy them. Don’t worry so much about the format. I would not recommend novelists start writing scripts (without training and experience); but most scriptwriters I talk to have read more novels than they have read scripts. You see where I am going with this. Watch out for my Cheltenham talk as a forthcoming article in TwelvePoint.

Story – not script-writing is the key, Cheltenham the place

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

The longer I am in the biz the more I believe that storytelling not scriptwriting is the key. Writers should simply (ha!) try to tell stories; the format – prose, script, long or short – is very secondary to the story to be told.

But for scriptwriters, there is so much emphasis put on structure by so many of the people selling courses and books that writers are forced into a painting-by-numbers and artificial way of writing that will usually result in bad writing.

This distorts the learning about writing. The truism, seldom followed, that plot comes out of character, is usually thought of after the basics of the plot have been decided. Instead, who the characters are should determine what happens, so know your characters first and worry about the three-act structure or 22 steps later.

Why am I bothering about this on such a lovely weekend? Because I am preparing for a session at the Screenwriters’ Festival on publishing. I believe that screenwriters should also consider writing prose, that novels are an important way of progressing your career as a screenwriter.

Apart from the many obvious reasons (novels generally make more money, they are easier to write, you own the film adaptation rights, you can describe what characters think and feel and so on), there are also many more novels published than films made and self-publishing is a great deal easier than making your own film (never mind so cheap with print-on-demand that it is laughable).

When I look through the lists of courses on offer that promise a short cut to being able to make a career as a writer, I am surprised how few have a health warning: “This course is almost statistically guaranteed, despite the few notable successes we have had, not to enable you to have a career as a writer, unless you arrive here with a great deal of talent, since we cannot teach you to have talent.”

Don’t get me wrong: many of the courses contribute in many ways to the lives of those taking them. The years (or weekends) with like-minded people, sharing values and friendship, is important. But you can’t learn to write in the same way as you learn either brain surgery or plumbing.

swf_logo_1jpg

So at this year’s Screenwriters’ Festival there will be a series of TwelvePoint sessions geared to the bits not usually taught in screenwriting classes: how to network, how to market yourself be good at your own PR, how to have a better website, how to negotiate, how to write prose documents that will sell your work better and how to tell stories in another format, namely prose, where there is a proper industry (the publishing industry) that is always on the lookout for good writing and good writers, an industry that publishes over 100,000 books a year (not counting a similar number of self-published books).

And that is quite apart from over 70 other sessions. Check the Festival website (www.screenwritersfestival.com) for an up-to-date listing of speakers and events. And if you are a TwelvePoint.com member you can join our booking group and get a big discount. After 4 days you will leave having had the best masterclass in fast-tracking your career that I can think of. And hopefully a lot of fun as well. When you then see an ad telling you that this or that organization or person offers you the secret of success as a writer, you will remember what you heard in Cheltenham: there is no secret way. It requires talent and perseverance. Why 80 sessions in 4 days? So you can tailor your choice to what you need. This could be the best investment you ever make for your career. Now, why would you believe me?

You think writing is hard? Try selling it after it is published.

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

There is a great cartoon showing a journalist standing in front of the Editor’s desk and he says to the editor: ‘You think my writing is hard to understand? You should try writing it!’

I spent the afternoon with an author and her publishers working out a marketing strategy to promote her recently published book (Janice Day, GETTING IT OFF MY CHEST, Old Street Publishers). Writing the book was hard because it involved going back to the experience of discovering that she had cancer (at the time her kids were young), dealing with telling friends and family, dealing with the doctors, feeling that chemotherapy was not right for her, finding alternative ways (major change in lifestyle and diet) and getting on with her life surviving.

A dozen years later the book is published. Her consultant has given her a clean bill of health and she has managed to write a really funny book about having and beating cancer: two considerable achievements. Her GP has said the book should be read by all doctors and patients. I think it should also be read by anyone who likes reading beautifully written memoirs. So why did we need to spend a whole afternoon discussing the strategy to market a book that has so much going for it?

Getting it Off My Chest

Maybe the marketing is more difficult than the writing. Is it a health book or a memoir? Some bookshops have it in biography, others in general and some in health. Morrisons’ Supermarket are doing a supermarket signing, yet it is also a literary memoir.

It will appeal to a range of people who perhaps seldom buy the same books. Having a niche target audience is easier but less challenging. National Breast Cancer Awareness month is coming up in October (good, a hook), feature articles are on the desks of various editors waiting their own Russian roulette. We have no control.

A number of interviews have been done, including audio and video (see http://www.janiceday.co.uk/). But still the clarity of the marketing campaign seems daunting. Will people with cancer read books on cancer? The jury is out on that. Will people who like humour read it in the context of cancer? Mmmmm…? If you are gonna die you might as well die laughing! No, perhaps that is not quite sensitive enough for the strategy campaign.

Social networking, linking to cancer websites and blogs, offering down-to-earth advice and good humour does seem to have a positive effect on everyone Janice speaks to, so we need to use that: the blog needs re-titling as this is about breast cancer not about her.

We leave the meeting energized and more focused. For the writer, getting to the end of a manuscript is only the beginning…of the editing and rewriting process; getting to the end of that is the beginning of the design and cover and initial marketing process. Getting the books into the bookshops is the beginning of getting the public to go and buy it. Writing the book begins to seem the easy bit.

How many writers write without thinking about how to sell their books? There is a saying in the film biz that if you show a film company how to sell your idea they will buy it. It isn’t that simple but we are ultimately – writers, agents, publishers and producers – in the business of selling to the public. We may all think we determine what they read; in fact they do.

Genre and the recession: is this the way forward?

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

It is always interesting to see if the world stopped while you went on holiday. Pleasingly it seemed to go on working (though some producers were not finalizing contracts as fast as desirable). The WGGB blog has the interesting story from Nick George, media partner, PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, who said:

“The recession has sent hoards of consumers to the cinema and therefore large scale, expensive films, such as Harry Potter, remain in production and eagerly awaited. However, due to the credit crunch, sources of financing for smaller indie films have dried up – meaning many plots remain on the story board.”

However, with digital technology bringing the costs of film-making down all the time, Nick George says that things should improve.

“The credit crunch has clearly made fundraising tougher for independent film makers but things tend to move in cycles, and the distribution of films like Colin and success of non-mainstream films like Juno and Slumdog Millionaire demonstrate a strong appetite for original, creative work, so in time we ought to see investors returning to the market.”

But on the upbeat side, in an interesting discussion about adaptation (I will chair a panel on adaptation at the Frankfurt Bookfair Film and Television Centre in October) I discussed with a writer that fact that some writers are good at adaptations, perhaps because they have the ability to stand away from the original material so instead of being tied to it they are inspired by it. www.frankfurt-bookfair.com

Thousands of editors attend every year and increasing numbers of producers are going, mainly in search of that novel which will make their next film. The Film and TV Centre is a hub of activity for anyone interested in books as the basis for films or TV.

An interesting discussion earlier in the day was about the fact that the British producers, under the cosh in the recession, are trying to develop material that is saleable to the US of A. This has always been a holy grail and with the exception of PBS channels not much British drama gets network showing in the States. But the cable channels over there are hot on genre and with the apparent lessening of ITV as a funder for Brit independents, there is a move to do high-concept TV movies that will work on small US screens.

Anything that helps us write and produce better genre stories is to be welcomed. After the UK Film Council’s not entirely successful 25 Words genre competition (ScriptWriter magazine published many articles explaining the different genres at the time) let’s hope that we do better this time round.

Publishing is a mixed economy

Friday, August 7th, 2009

The recession has affected many industries, although there is a wishful stream of consciousness that encourages those of us who work in film, television and publishing to believe that in depressed times people need more entertainment.

Movie-going is on the increase, but it is not cheap especially if you buy popcorn and soft drinks. Are the films better than they were before the recession? I doubt it. Maybe the unemployed have so much time on their hands that they have to go to the cinema more often?

Big brand name writers – script or book – are doing well. When RPM (do you remember it?) was taken off books, the brand-name authors were stacked high and sold cheaply by the chains and supermarkets and sold more than ever. Niche books did OK since they almost always do because if you need a specific ‘narrow-cast’ title you will pay for it, so it is less price-sensitive and therefore can be more profitable.

What suffered was what was called ‘ the midlist’, those books that were not by well-known authors and therefore were less able to be bought in bulk. That is what the current recession is doing: squeezing the mid-list. Many really well-written and interesting books are not getting published by mainstream publishers. Unless they see the author or title being taken up by the chains, it is easy to say no since there are hundreds of other titles on offer to them.

For some titles it is taking longer to find a publisher, and the smaller publishers are getting more choice than they have had before because of this. The skill lies in matching up the publisher (or even the editor within the publishing house) with the author and title.

Seven-figure deals are still being done for best-selling authors, alongside smaller deals for books that are unusual, unpredictable or difficult. Among recent titles I have been very pleased with are Old Street Publishing Janice Day’s very funny and upbeat memoir about breast cancer. Jurgen Wolff described it as very funny…one of those books where you will laugh and cry. You can also hear her sing on YouTube from her website.

At the end of this week I witnessed the signing of a contract that has taken rather longer than I had hoped: a very unusual and compelling novel about the young Adolf Hitler. German publishers are running scared and won’t consider the book until there is a British publisher; German film companies are very keen, but won’t make an offer until it is being published outside Germany. Germany’s leading academic expert on this period of Hitler’s life says it is the best portrait of the young man available (and has written a Foreword).

Last week the contract was signed by Naim Attallah of Quartet and the author of Young Hitler, Claus Hant. It has taken a while to get to this moment, partly because a novel in which all the facts about the main character are scrupulously researched, with 150 pages of utterly fascinating appendices, is not an easy novel to sell. Naim Attallah laughed off the difficulties saying that he specialized in publishing difficult provocative books well.

The signing of the contract

The signing of the contract

The week then ended with a very positive meeting with a distributor for Helen Blizard’s film about teenagers and bullying, Innocent. That deal still has to be struck, but they loved the trailer (mentioned in these blogs before) so we press on.

In a recession you have to make sure the material is better than ever – publishers still want books, audiences still want to see films. The younger they are (under 15) the more they watch on the small screen. Embracing that – for writers and agents – is another way of staying recession-proof.

Why I love being an agent

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Went to delightful launch of Garen Ewing’s amazing new graphic novel The Rainbow Orchid tonight at Foyles’ Gallery. I had seen the book in the agency but I was not prepared for the amazing drawings hanging up in the gallery, drawings showing how Garen drew the pages of the novel.

img_0614
Here is the author (on the right) with his Blake Friedmann agent Oli Munson.

What was so nice (in this rat-race world of editors being fired and advances being smaller than 20 years ago) was the enthusiasm. People had come from far and wide: a couple who had never met Garen but had followed the gestation of the book for 5 years online and had corresponded with him had made him a cake with a symbol from the book on the cake.

I realised that there is something magical about being involved in the creative world. It has nothing to do with money but with talent and craft and aspiration to be the best and to move people and make the world a better place.

Yes I know what George Orwell said (since I love quoting him): that sheer egotism is a large part of why writers write. But when it gives so many so much pleasure then it is magical. Good to be reminded of that.

You can get to see some of Garen’s work by clicking on this link: http://www.blakefriedmann.co.uk/bookClients/_302/

If you can’t get to Hollywood get to Cheltenham

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Had lunch today with a client who has just returned from Comic-Con and LA. What fun it sounded, not only the loony costumes (admittedly being worn by loving, die-hard (not Die Hard) fans but the casual way stars and major double-A-list producers wandered round accessible to all.

He just ‘happened’ to meet, for instance, Gail Ann Hurd as well as many other notables. I have made a note in the diary to go next year. If you have to work at least have fun too. There seemed to be a lot of British writers and producers there. What are we missing?

That made me think that we need to make our own events this side of the pond more effective: I have such high hopes for Cheltenham Screenwriters’ Festival this year. Two of us are going from the agency and such is the rishes of the programme being planned that we won’t be able to cover all the 80 events taking place in the four days.

I volunteered to take part of the speed dating (one part is with agents, the other with producers), and it will ensure that no writer goes away without business cards. I am always surprised that so many writers don’t have business cards. TwelvePoint will do lots of preparation so that delegates are really well prepared and all delegates get six month’s free membership of TwelvePoint!

There is no doubt that being able to cut it in your home market is the key to getting great meetings in LA, simply because being nominated, winning awards, getting commissions or spec sales make producers take notice, and it is easier to do that in the market where you can network.

There again many of those who write do so because they don’t like the social side of the biz: easier if you are a novelist than a scriptwriter, though these days if a publisher cannot see you pounding the pavements, schools (if it is a kids’ book) and doing readings, they may not offer as much if at all.

PR for writers – there is a subject not dealt with sufficiently. Must see if we can get the indomitable Kate Adamson to talk at Cheltenham. She could make a block of wood lively.

If you are serious about making it in LA start with the articles by Skip Press and others in TwelvePoint’s archives: he even describes how using email you can convey the impression that you are in the US when you submit. You just have to have a great excuse when they ask you in for a meeting (’I have an audience with a Papal official for my research into the secret organization that runs the Vatican…’). After all you are a writer so make good something up. It is not a lie. It is something you would like to do and your writing deals with the imaginary state that exists between the real world and memory, which is as real but just not the same. You know what I mean.

I will also get the client who met Gail Ann Hurd to come to Cheltenham.

The privilege of being a writer

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Strange day today: every few months the book and film/TV departments at the agency sit down and go through the entire client list so the film/TV agents can tell the book agents what is happening re their clients. Nice to see today that there was rather a lot to report: the two very different worlds (book as opposed to film/TV) can have great synergy.

Now if only all those options would be exercised and all of them would go into production?

Then we did an annual tidy up, clearing out all the paper that we no longer needed to keep, partly because the new scanner scans at 70 pages a minute. We have also started preparing for the Frankfurt Bookfair (in October) as meetings are already being set up for visits from publishers and scouts in the weeks before the bookfair, since we cannot get all the meetings we need to have into the 5 days of the fair.

Because we are coming up to the August holiday season, when things slow down, we expect deals to go slowly. For once they seem to be piling in faster than ever so that the writers can get cracking over the summer break. That is a turn up…

And the writers’ enthusiasm and appreciation makes me feel that despite the difficulties I have talked about in the blog recently, it really it a privilege being able to make a living – even if it is a difficult one – as a writer. George Orwell may well have been right about this: apart from egotism he gave three other reasons for being a writer: immortality, getting back at people who had put you down and changing the world. How many jobs give you that satisfaction?

That satisfaction is one of the abiding memories I have of the Cheltenham Screenwriters’ Festival: writers getting together to share their experiences in a cameraderie that makes the delegate fees so well worth while.